Monday, January 7, 2013

The Rapture of PM Dawn

I've never been one to look deeply into the subtext of pop songs. I'm more of a melody/orchestration type of person. I suppose I'm not really to blame... I did come of (musical) age in the 80s, when casual surrealism was the norm for pop lyrics. Really, listen to "Shock the Monkey" or just about anything by Duran Duran and you'll see what I mean. A song wasn't nearly as much about what it said as the atmosphere evoked. Out of this era – a time when Eddy Grant's "Electric Avenue" was near the pinnacle of politically-minded pop -- the hyper-literate lyricists of the 90s hit like a freight train. You suddenly had the pointed, unmistakable points of view of both grunge and gangsta rap dominating the airwaves, making us all aware of our neighbor's anger and angst in equal, ferocious measure.

Into the midst of this maelstrom floated PM Dawn and their ubiquitous hit "Set Adrift on Memory Bliss". Not only did it distinguish itself by basing its chorus on a sample from the lite-AM crossover hit "True" by Spandau Ballet (and layering a wash of harmonies over the already-ethereal hook of that song), but its rapped lyrics were hushed and introspective, a meditative reminiscence of a love lost. It was the last thing that should have been a big hit, but it was, making us all aware of this new facet of hip-hop. Even the band's name invoked thoughts of paradox and wonder.

If you believe that a band's first single should establish its entire mindset for listeners, then PM Dawn (comprised of Prince Be and his brother, DJ Minute Mix -- nee Attrell and Jarrett Cordes) aced their first test. You knew exactly what you were going to get from them -- New Age spiritualism, hippie-like navel gazing, and smooth listening. Most people dismissed them as such. But as time passed and PM Dawn put more singles and albums under their belt, they started moving toward something else, and this is where their story gets really interesting.

They chose to name their third album "Jesus Wept", and took a decidedly Christian bent to their musical approach. They even went as far as to use one song's subtitle to dedicate it "to the Christ Consciousness". With this collection of songs, which opens with a sound collage that includes a sample of Linus van Pelt writing a letter to the Great Pumpkin, we were introduced to a masterful exploration of two brothers grappling directly with what it means to be Christian, and even further, what it means to be human in the face of the eternal.

As if begins, Jesus Wept is something that even a non-Christian as myself can identify with. It’s no faith-affirming tribute from a reborn child of God. In fact, it turns out to be a soul-searching, humble offering from an imperfect, broken human being to a divinity that he seems to fear might reject him. In fact, the table set by "Set Adrift on Memory Bliss" wasn't that far off the mark... nearly all of PM Dawn's songs can almost be read as lost-love songs. Lines such as "Sometimes I miss you so much" and "Without you in my life, I always find my mind miles from anything" could be lifted directly from other girl-please-come-back songs, but as time goes on also work as Christian allegory. PM Dawn is strongest when they play off this dichotomy; their follow-up album, called "Dearest Christian, I'm So Very Sorry For Bringing You Here. Love, Dad" works equally well whether the father speaking is Prince Be, or God himself.

The most important track from Jesus Wept, in my mind, is the final medley, for some reason called "Fantasia's Confidential Ghetto". I think by dissecting it a little bit, you will get a pretty comprehensive idea of PM Dawn's point of view. First is a slow, acoustic guitar and piano version of Prince's "1999", a song that does deal with Judgment Day, albeit in its own funky way. In this version, Prince Be sings the melody andorned, changing the word "party" in the last line so that it reads: "So tonight I'm gonna cry like it's 1999."

Immediately following this, the beat picks up with a reworking of Talking Heads' "Once in a Lifetime", for which PM Dawn swipes the piano loop from Schoolhouse Rock's "Rufus Xavier Sasparilla" to drive it along. The lyrics of that song remain unchanged, but David Byrne's Revival-sermon-style ramblings about suddenly finding yourself as a strange in your own life and howling "My God, what have I done?" fits right in with the message we've been working with for the whole album.

The third and final part is an almost word-for-word rendition of Harry Nilsson’s goofy “Coconut”, with a notable exception that flips the original in a completely different direction. First of all, Nilsson’s simple guitar part is augmented with the organ part of Three Dog Night’s “Mama Told Me Not To Come”, which is an almost blindingly astute melodic match. The original lyrics deal with a man calling a doctor to prescribe something to help his indigestion after imbibing some lime-and-coconut-based drink. However, by changing the line “called the doctor, woke him up” to “pray to God as to wake him up”, the song becomes the story of mankind doing things they shouldn’t, and then turning to God to help them fix the problems they’ve caused. Here, God has the answer, and it’s the same as what the doctor recommended in the original: “If you call me in the morning, I’ll tell you what to do.” Certainly a persuasive argument to head to church.

The progression in this three-song medley – grief to realization to salvation -- is the path PM Dawn has been trying to lead us down all along. The clues were there, even in the title of the album itself; “Jesus wept” is well-known to trivia buffs as the shortest verse in the Bible, but it comes from the Gospel of John. It tells of Jesus’ reaction to seeing the mourning going on around the tomb of Lazarus. In those two words, the Gospel establishes the duality of Christ… He is beyond us, but at the same time of us, feeling our pain and grief. In the story, Jesus resurrects Lazarus, and I think therein lies the ultimate message of PM Dawn… No matter how vain, selfish, or damaged a person may be, God loves them and can be turned to for salvation. As deep as the self-doubt on the album can sometimes be, there is also transcendence, and it’s a more effective message than any of the praise-His-glory Christian rock or rap you could ever listen to.

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Only Resolutions

At this point in life, most people have figured out that New Year's resolutions never stick. The first of January is just another day in an unending waterfall of days, coming at the tail end of a cluster of "special days" near the end of the year, and as such there's really nothing inherently special about it. But I think this year I'm going to give it a try. There are a few things that I really want to take a serious stab at improving about myself.

2012 didn't turn out to be anything close to the year I wanted it to be. Mainly because t was the second consecutive year that I got laid off from a job. At this point, I've resigned myself to accept that the next job I get won't be my life's passion, it will be (at best) my rebound job. With this mindset, I think I can keep myself from being disappointed about it, but still open to keep looking for what my next career step will be.

But I'm getting a little ahead of myself. Let me get back to *why* I'm making them this time around... it really comes down to the reason that people have arbitrarily picked the first day of the year to make these kind of self-promises in general. The changes we want to make in ourselves are all ones of attitude, and even those especially ambitious resolutions, the ones that require major shifts in the world around us, require an attitude change as that crucial first step. This internal change isn't one that you can prepare for and work yourself up for, it's one you just have to *do*. It's why they're called "resolutions". Resolving to do them is the main thing. In this light, no day is better than any other to start. So the only thing better than digging in your heels and making the change on January first would be to do it on December 31st.

And maybe there's some power in knowing that there are other people out there trying to make the same changes, ignoring for a moment the ones who don't really mean it. It means that, even if it's just in a small way, the world that we're collectively stepping out into on the first day of the first month isn't quite the same as the one we left on the last day of the last month. Maybe our new ways will be eased by our mutual attempts to make steps in a positive direction. And even if they don't, there's some sort of value in thinking that they might, isn't there?

So here are my resolutions for 2013, starting with the obvious:

1.) Get a Job. I don't really have the option of not following through on this one. The jokers in Washington have left a lot of things in limbo as of 1/1/13, not the least of which is the question of whether federal unemployment insurance will be extended. If not, I have until the end of March until the state program runs out. After that, my family and I are on our own. Of course, it's very possible (even likely) that Congress will enact the extension (and pay out a lump sum for the poor folks who got cut off, I assume?) by the end of February, but I just can't wait around for that. So I'm going to have to cast my net wider, look at jobs that I could conceivably do, rather than ones that continue the track I've been on so far. I'm sure you'll be hearing more about this adventure as time goes on.

2.) Weight. It's a classic resolution, I know. But the other day I weighed myself (which I do only about once a month) and realized that I'm a good 7-8 pounds above and beyond what I'm comfortable being. I usually don't think much about my weight, other than to thank good fortune that, despite my utter lack of exercise and discipline about my caloric intake, I manage to stay at a decent, stable level. I think a little effort on my part should be enough to make the difference, so this one should be a slow but steadily attainable goal.

3.) Read more Classics. Last year my wife and I both had record-breaking years as far as reading goes, me with over 13,000 pages, and her with a staggering 23,000. I managed to polish off two of the longest books written in English (the New King James translation of the Old and New Testaments of the Bible, and David Foster Wallace's "Infinite Jest"), and I feel like I'm on a roll. So this year I'm looking to close some gaps in my literary bulkheads. I don't mean things like Bronte and Dickens (although I mean to get around to them eventually), but what is deemed to be the classics of the genres that I typically read now, the authors that paved the way, and which I'm somewhat embarrassed to admit I've never read -- Heinlein and Matheson and Bloch and Ellison and Campbell and so on. I've already started my first Philip K. Dick, so I think I'm off to a good start.

4.) Stop Reading Comments. This is my one Internet-based resolution... I've decided not to scroll beyond the bottom of any article or piece of interest and actually read the comments. I've found that when I do, the feeling I consistently come away with is one of loss of faith in humanity. In my experience, there has never been a well-intentioned Internet item followed by comments that weren't mostly populated by a) boneheads who have nothing better to do than make snarky, cynical judgments about what they just read, b) people who call out the snarky, cynical judgment-makers, and c) people who criticize the spelling/grammar of types a) and b). No more, I say!

5.) Keep Writing, Dammit. November and December were banner writing months for me, and it all came down to the discipline that 750words.com has provided me. I'm writing in it right now, and will copy/paste my 1000-plus words for today into my master blog document when I'm done. I can't adequately say how gratifying it's been to find something like this deceptively simple tool. In these last two months, I've written more than probably the last two years combined. It's really told me something about myself, that all it took was a simple structure (and the awarding of points doesn't hurt either) to get me doing the thing that, above and beyond any other work I could be doing, I feel that I *should* be doing most.

6.) Enjoying Now. I've said it before, in various ways, and I'm about to say it again. When this bout of unemployment is over, when I'm back to full-time and doing whatever it is I have to do to get the mortgage paid, food on the table and maybe have a little left in the bank, I'm going to look back at this time and marvel at how great it was to spend time with my wife and daughter. Lily's at an important age right now... she's going to start kindergarten in the fall, and like it or not, school it going to become the bulk of her daily experience, instead of the time she spends at home with Amy and me. I think the fact that I was a nearly constant presence in her life from the age of before three-and-a-half to after four-and-a-half has got to be meaningful for our relationship later on. And I'm also so glad I get to spend more time with Amy, even though we can't always get enough time for ourselves. This time has reminded me that we're a team, and work well together on more levels than we realize. Having a child Lily's age (and, I'm starting to suspect, at any age) is an adventure in which you need a strong partner, and I hope that she's as satisfied with rediscovering the one she's got as I am. Once it's not tempered by the anxiety of an unknown future, we're going to reflect on this time and be grateful we had it, over a year when our young family was in some ways just starting out, and in some ways finding its next course.

There they are. Nothing earth-shaking, I think, or totally out of left field. I just want to do a little better than I did last year. Isn’t that what we all should be striving for?

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Why Gay is Great

I've been meaning to write on this subject for a long time, but it wasn't until recently, mostly because of the presidential election, that I've figured out what's been defining my thoughts on it. It all comes down to this: the reason we continue to have problems with human rights in this world is, ironically, caused by the thing that causes civilization to exist at all.

People are social animals. And by grouping together in order to survive, there is immediately put into place the most basic of definitions: *you* are part of my group, *you* are not. And that, I think, is the root of all prejudice. But the world, as they say, is moving on. We're no longer restricted to being part of one social group our entire lives (I think I read once that the ideal sustainable number of people in one's social circle is 150). As you mature, you find yourself working with, living alongside, and having to get along with a more diverse spectrum of people. And, as I hope we've all started to notice, the best way to realize that we're all pretty much the same is to get to know people who you think are fundamentally different than you.

What I'm talking about in particular today is homosexuality. Even in the society that I like to think we're living in today, it's the most pervasive prejudice there is, beyond skin color or religion. And do you know why I think that is? Because of lack of empathy. Think about it: the second most divisive aspect of our lives is religion, but even if a person hates those of a different faith, they at least understand the concept, based on the fact that they have beliefs, too.

Homosexuality is harder, because the people who aren't gay have it hardwired into their DNA to *not* *understand* what it means to be gay. I'll have to take myself as an example, and understand that what I'm about to say comes from my own perspective... I don't find men sexually attractive, in any way. I have no idea what it is that makes men attractive in that way to other men, or to women for that matter. Just no concept. Based on how I have seen others reacting, I can kind of extrapolate which men are going to be perceived by the general public as handsome (and am right probably 75% of the time), but that's all it is: extrapolation. When it comes to male beauty, there's just a hole in my psyche. It’s sort of like the feeling you get when you hear the punchline of an inside joke that you’re not part of. You might be aware of it, you might hear about it every day, but you’re never going to truly understand it. And that's as it should be, for the most part. I'm evolutionarily driven to procreate, and the best way to do that is to make me attracted to women exclusively. For me, and most other heterosexual males, it’s an open and shut case. Never the twain shall meet.

Like I stated at the beginning, the problem that I see is one of empathy. If you're not gay, then gay love is at worst, physically repulsive, and at best, just kind of baffling. But you don't have to know what it feels like to know that it's just as valid as the ridiculous things you think of in your most romantic hetero moments, too. The trouble is, that it’s a long step into this kind of empathy, and I'm not entirely sure that everyone is wired to take it.

There's always some argument for the intolerant to hide behind:

"Adopting the gay lifestyle is a choice." I think everyone, now that the stigma is starting to lift and everyone under the age of fifty have gay friends in their social circle, is waking up to the fact that you're about as able to control your sexual orientation as you are able to control your eye color. There is no "gay lifestyle" (just like there isn’t a “gay agenda”, by the way -- unless you mean promoting tolerance, which is just as much a no-brainer as promoting racial tolerance). There are almost as many ways for people to live their lives as there are actual people. It’s just a term used to make it sounds like it’s a choice, something that *isn’t* programmed into our DNA, and just as strong as heterosexuality. If your child is straight, no amount of glamorization of this potential "gay lifestyle" they could be living it up in is going to sway them. They're going to be just as unmoved by it as you are... that is, unless they really are gay. All it takes is a frank conversation with a real live gay person to find out that they’ve always been gay, and never “chose” it.

"The Bible says it's unclean." It also says you can't eat shrimp. They carry equal punitive weight. (Side note: there was a picture going around the Internet earlier this year of a young man who had the oft-quoted anti-gay Leviticus verse tattooed onto his arm... guess he didn't read the rest of the chapter, where it also tells you not to deface your body in exactly the way he did.) Things change, and I defy you to find one religious denomination that doesn't cherry-pick their "do"s and "don't"s, no matter how literally they take their religious text. Homosexuality should be just as skimmable as residing in the same dwelling as a menstruating female.

“Homosexuality is an evolutionary dead-end, and thus unnecessary.” Nature is, by definition, the most complex thing there is, and the fact that people think they can fully comprehend it is astonishing to me. Look at it this way: there are checks and balances everywhere in nature to prevent overpopulation. Food chains, predator/prey symbiosis, etc. Now, suppose I told you that there was a way to prevent human overpopulation, but it also allowed all people to live lives that are as physically and emotionally rich as those who can biologically procreate? You’d think that would be a good evolutionary step forward, wouldn’t you? Well, homosexuality fits that bill really nicely. Evolution gets it right again!

"Legitimization of gay relationships is a slippery slope, leading toward people marrying animals." This comes up more often than you would think. And I suppose, if there are actually people out there that you consider to be no better than animals, then this argument holds some sort of weight for you. If not, you at least have to admit that it's pretty damn funny. Are there really enough people out there who *want* to marry animals that this comes even within spitballing distance of getting legislated? And exactly what red flags wouldn't go up if someone tried this, regardless of whether that state had legalized gay marriage?

Every argument against homosexuality, however it's cloaked, comes down to four simple words: "I don't get it." And therein lies the biggest problem. Straight people don't understand homosexuality on its most basic level, which is simply loving someone of the same sex. Not only that, but they are specifically wired *not* to. And I suspect the same is true of gay individuals... the only difference is that they know the ins and outs of heterosexuality because it's the basis of about 99.9% of popular culture – the same way I can guess whether Man A or Man B is more likely to be voted The Sexiest Man Alive (and I always found it amusing that they feel they have to throw the “Alive” criterion in there). Social norms have been shoved in their faces since birth, maybe even more strongly once their parents and authority figures began to understand what direction their tendencies lay.

So here's this genetically-derived, uncrossable chasm of ignorance, and I mean that in the classical sense of simply not knowing something. What kind of accord can we come to when such an expanse lies between us? Maybe the answer lies in taking the pressure off marriage as an institution, and the religious implications that it’s always been tied to… Twenty years ago, the sci-fi writer Arthur C. Clarke came up with what I think is a great idea. He suggested that couples, straight or gay, shouldn't get married at all. What we should have ceremonies for, and be legally bound by, is our duty and responsibility to our children, to care for them physically and emotionally until adulthood, and beyond if we see fit. No matter what their strengths are, no matter whom they love, no matter our own relationship failings. That's the one unifying piece of this puzzle; children raised in love, no matter the kind, have a better chance of prospering. I think that's one thing we can all agree on.

Friday, November 30, 2012

The Story of Lily’s First Story

Timing, as we know, is everything. So I don’t know why I’m so surprised that, just a day after posting about my very first story, my daughter should spend some time today dictating to me one of her own. As I said in my previous post, my literary debut was in kindergarten, and she’s only four! She beat me by a whole year!

Here's the setting: we were taking a break from playing in the late afternoon. It had just started snowing for the first time this season, and she had been looking out the front window a lot, watching it fall. I moved on to something else, and before I knew it she had pulled out a little notebook with that Julius monkey on the cover, which she had gotten with a Happy Meal (or a different fast-food establishment's analog) a month or so before. She picked up a mechanical pencil that I had been using earlier and started sketching lines and swirls across most of the pages.

After a while, she handed it to me and started asking me to write down phrases for her. I started on the first page and started trying to keep up as she gave me things to write, after which she would inspect my chicken scratchings. She turned to the back of the book and asked me to draw a McDonald's, which I did, and then she turned to the second-to-last page and told me to write something else down. Over the course of the next twenty minutes, she dictated a story to me, which I dutifully transcribed, progressing backwards through the notebook. I present it here, in its entirety.

WE'RE GOING TO MCDONALD'S by Lily Drummond

McDonald's is the place that they're going.
"We're almost there."
"Didn't I already say that? Because we're almost there but it's far away."
We're far far away now. I don't tell what kind of McDonald's is on the map.
We're still far away.
We're almost there, but we're still far away a little.
We're not here yet.
It's snowing outside!
Now it's raining outside.
Marina and Paul walked down the street.
Paul and Marina got back into the car and then they said, "It's still raining but now it's turning into snow."
"This road is too far for me!" Paul said.
Paul ended up in a place very different. He ended up in Lalaloopsyland.
"Where is this place?" Paul asked.
Spot said, "It's Lalaloopsyland!"
Something really had happened when Mad Finger started to make Lalaloopsyland a chef.
"Oh no! We're going to fall! We're going to crash into a big chef statue!" Paul said.
David is one of the kids. David says, "I'm painting in the car!"
Paul says, "That's funny. Why are you painting in the car instead of in the house?"
"This is going to be my masterpiece!"
Molly, one of the girl kids, said, "My ears are swollen."
Nick will say, "Hey, break our car! We're going to crash at the park. We're going to falllllll..."
Crash!
This is the ending of my story.
Holly Hobbie says, "I thought our garden would be bigger."
Marina says, "Paul, it will take so long that we'll have to go back until we do something."
There's a bee buzzing around our car! Until we see Mad Finger.
DUN DUN DUNNNNNNN!
"Hm. I have to ruin the city until anyone knows."
Peter will say, "I thought we will drive around flowers instead of the road."
Peter's garden had been chewed by a cat.
"And then you're in your pajamas! How did you say that? I thought you didn't!" said Molly.

There you have it. I like how she started to incorporate things she was thinking about at the time she was telling me the story, about the falling snow or her Lalaloopsy dolls or Mad Finger (who you can find out more about in an earlier post). I have no idea who Paul, Peter, and Nick are. She even threw in some elements from a TV show that was going on in the background at the time, the buzzing bee, driving along a road, or the cat that passed through the room.

I don't know if Lily is going to turn out to be a writer. I hope that, by my and Amy's actions, she's getting some idea of how improved your life can be by reading and writing. She’s quite a reader already, and daily stuns me with some of the words she can sound out -- today it was "lionesses", by the way. But just in case, I wanted to make sure that I saved her first attempt at stringing things together herself. I'm just glad I was there to put it down.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

The Collected Works

Maybe it’s because of my recently-passed birthday, and that I am in pretty much the same place I was last year at this time, but I’ve been thinking a lot about Legacy. I mean that as a big idea, the thing that will live on past my lifetime. I think everyone has some idea of what they want it to be, whether it’s their children, their work, or their art. Of course, I’d like to have all three of those things, but what I’m focusing on today is my writing.

Because, you see, I don’t think I’ve used the last year wisely when it comes to writing. I’ve had all this “free” time, but I’ve only written a handful of blog posts, and have hardly worked at all on any sizeable projects. Left to my own devices in an unstructured environment, I do stuff that doesn’t contribute to my writing. Does that mean that I’ll never be able to make it as a full-time writer? Or does that just make me like every other writer out there?

Whether it does or not, I’ve been thinking about all the writing I’ve done in my life. What does it amount to, really? For starters, I can take a look at this very document I’m typing this entry into… it contains all my blog posts so far. But then I got thinking, how much other work do I have? If I created some kind of Norton Anthology of every original work I’ve ever written down, what would it amount to? Well, let’s settle in and break it down, starting with childhood:

It all started with a story I wrote in kindergarten about Woody Woodpecker taking a trip to the moon. I have *no* idea where this came from, since I’ve only ever been peripherally aware of Woody Woodpecker, and never watched the cartoons with any regularity. I think I might have had a digest-size comic book about him back at that time, so maybe that was where it came from. But this was a school project, with illustrations, bound in cardboard covered with brown corduroy. My parents still have it around somewhere. So I was actually a little ahead of the self-publishing curve, wasn’t I?

I don’t think I wrote with any regularity until fourth grade, when I showed my teacher a story I had written. It was only two pages long and had about a dozen chapters (back then, my concept of “chapter” and “paragraph” were pretty much interchangeable), which she liked so much that she started a weekly creative writing workshop for the whole class. The other students’ work consisted mostly of wedging other kids’ names into action stories or talking about dreams they had, but I tried to come up with something interesting each time, even made some attempts at serialized storytelling, where I’d write a chapter a week of a continuing story. Of course, I don’t think I ever wrote a second chapter to any of them. These stories I still have, in a three-ring binder that my parents got me for Christmas that year. They taped a piece of construction paper on the front. They wrote “Stories by Aaron” and a little note on it, saying how enthusiastic they were about them.

In late elementary school, based on my obsessive love for movies (or as obsessive a ten-year-old’s love for them can be) I made some attempts at writing screenplays. These started as scenes and treatments for sequels of movies that I liked (“Tron II” and the nonsensically-named Indiana Jones project “Raiders of the Death Spirit” are the only ones that come to mind.) I didn’t really hit my stride, though, until the sixth grade. A rich but unpopular acquaintance of mine from school dropped the hint that he might be able to get a movie made if I would write it. Looking back, he probably said it as a way to get to hang out with him more (there’s a whole other post I could write about how moving around so much as a child resulted in most of my friends being the kids that everyone else in the school already knew were kind of jerks), but I did actually apply myself and write what came passably close to being a feature-length script. It was called “Under the Full Moon”, and had a definite Indiana Jones influence to it, although the heroes of this one were a pair of brothers (not coincidentally the same age as me and my friend), last name Henderson. There was also an older sister and a mom, and they were all traveling to Wales to find their missing archaeologist father, who was searching for the ruins of Camelot.

In the story, they do find it, but also find that their father has been sacrificed by a cult of devil worshipers who have taken over the ruins out in the wilds of Wales. From there, it turns into a series of revenge action set-pieces, a very Temple-of-Doom scenario. It ends with the vestiges of Camelot being blown up and pretty much ruined even more than they were before, along with the devil-cult. Believe me, it sounds better than it really is.

I remember showing this to my friend who had “commissioned” it, taking his notes and incorporating them into the script. I know that I passed it around my family for reactions, but the only one I can recall is a friend of the family reading it and laughing at some of the jokes. I even ended up approaching the older sister of one of my other friends, and asking her if she’d play the part of the older sister when we got around to filming. But nothing ever happened with it – I’m sure my friend was actually surprised I finished it. We went to the same K-12 school, but because by the time I finished the script he was in sixth grade and I was in seventh, we were based in different buildings and our paths rarely crossed. Eventually I stopped bugging him about it. The experience didn’t stop me from starting a sequel, though. It was called Return of Atlantis, and I honestly don’t remember much about it except that there was a scene where the adventurous Henderson family were thrown out of an airplane, but survived by landing in a backyard swimming pool.

There were other attempts started back in those days, stories based on Dungeons and Dragons (which my brother, cousin and I were into for a brief period), plus an attempt to break the Guinness World Record for longest novel, which I think I got about three pages into before abandoning. It seemed like I wanted everything I started to be an epic, and then gave up when it turned out that I didn’t have anything to say beyond my initial idea.

Also in my filing cabinet is a small collection of poetry I wrote for a project in seventh-grade, although honestly I couldn’t get past the basic requirements. Poetry in general doesn’t interest me, unless there’s something about it that I’m personally invested in. I guess I tend to think that writing in general should flow easily into your mind, almost as if you’re thinking of it yourself. Poetry in general seems to be hard to understand, and more for the writer of it than the reader. There’s great stuff out there, of course (Poe is a good example), but there’s nothing in me that says “Ooh, poetry! Gotta get some of that.” My eyes tend to glaze over as soon as I start reading it.

Eighth grade brought a Composition class, and I still have the writings I did in there… man, are they bad. But it really taught me that I just can’t write under pressure. The inspiration has to come before I can write anything. It can’t be forced. I didn’t find much inspiration between 8th and 11th grades… I remember starting several stories that were either adaptations of movies, or based on videogames I was into. It really seems that during this time I was spinning my wheels, trying to keep my writing muscles toned while not really having much to say.

In tenth grade, I volunteered to write a section of my school music department’s Musical Revue, which was something that they did on alternate years, when they didn’t have a school musical. This was where I first came in contact with Amy, my future wife, since she and a friend of hers had written another section. My own contribution was terrible and had no ending, but it got me into a script-writing mode that I would pursue for more than a few more years.

Another of the participants in that year’s Musical Revue was none other than Javier Grillo-Marxuach, who would go on to be a respected writer for TV shows such as Lost, and creator of cult show favorite The Middle Man, and the musical revue was my first chance working with him. He had started up something in the drama department called Lunchbox Theater, a student-run theater program that produced original plays that were rehearsed, promoted, and performed by students entirely during the lunch hour, at the rate of one about every other week. After Javier’s graduation, I continued working on that program until I graduated, even becoming president of it during my senior year.

During this time, I wrote only one show by myself (“Still of the Night”, a weird, pun-filled comedy about a group of friends getting lost while driving through the desert at night), although I did do a short bit called “Kung-Fu Theater”, in which I said all the cheesy dialogue, and my friends onstage did equally cheesy martial arts fights and moved their lips as I overdubbed their lines. It was quite popular, and a full Lunchbox Theater production was cobbled together around it, so the whole thing took on an SCTV-ish form of late-night TV shows and commercial parodies.

Also in my senior year, I wrote and directed the majority of another Musical Revue. Granted, it didn’t come off as well as planned, but it was my first full-scale production that I helmed. I also wrote the scripts for two silent shorts that I did for a film class, but of course those don’t count because they had no words.

I was working on fiction during this time as well, but as my wife and original reading audience will tell you, I had this tendency to overwrite and run things into the ground. I would focus on one idea, latching onto it and refusing to let it go until I had made every attempt to figure out whether it would work best as a novel, screenplay, stage play… whatever format I could think of, trying to find the one approach that would unlock it, until I was thoroughly bored with it and either unable or unwilling to fix its inherent flaws. I remember, among other ideas that I treated this way: a man who finds that the whole world is a construct, the equivalent of an elaborate stage show, by climbing a high building at sunset and watching the sun being shut off and pulled back through a giant pair of doors. Later, I thought I really had a great idea with three generations of vampires, all living together and eternally young but having entirely different ideas of their places as predators in the world.)

So I went back to the script-writing mode and stayed there for a while. In the mid-90’s I worked on three different projects in that vein, this time aiming for feature-film territory. My plan developed into having three different spec scripts – one completely original, one literary adaptation, and one sequel to an established franchise -- that I could shop around… all are complete, although one still needs a finished second draft and polish.

The Original: Syzygy – The story of a haunted hitwoman named Raven Airheart. She gets an assignment to kill a woman in her hometown, and it turns out to be her husband’s first love. He and the target run off before the hit goes down, and a cross-country chase ensues. I worked on this during spare moments at the Borders book warehouse. The process was fascinating. I essentially wrote the middle first, then had to create a backstory that became the beginning, while at the same time working my way toward an ending. It was a constant juggling of How did I get here? and Where am I going? That ending, though… I was really excited when I first came up with the idea of how to wrap it all up, but now it seems derivative to me, borrowing heavily from Bradbury’s Something Wicked This Way Comes and Orson Welles’s film The Lady from Shanghai. But overall, I think it’s a strong first effort. I actually got it copyrighted and certified by the WGA so that I could submit it to the original Project Greenlight online contest (remember that?), where the first round winners were determined by other competing screenwriters who critiqued it. Reviews were mixed to positive, but it didn’t make it to the second round.

The Adaptation: Next, I made a script of out Tim Lucas’s novel Throat Sprockets (one of my favorite unheard-of novels), set in the pre-Internet 80s, when a man becomes obsessed with a vampire art film that he sees at a local theater by accident. He gets pulled into an underworld of bootleg videos and vampire subculture as, it seems, everyone else in the world slowly becomes obsessed by the film as well. I really liked the way the script developed, becoming something that was actually quite different in tone than the original novel, although parts of it are lifted (mostly the movie-within-a-movie that becomes the main character’s obsession) directly from the novel’s pages.

The Sequel: Alien 4. I was initially dissatisfied with Alien 3, especially the way they killed off all the characters who went through hell and survived the second film of the series. So I turned Part 3 into a symbolic fever dream, and made this what “really” happened after Ripley, Newt, Hicks and Bishop returned to Earth…. It turns out that the Weyland-Yutani Corporation has actually gotten some Alien eggs into their secret labs underneath their massive pyramidal office building. Newt (now a grown woman and going by her given name Rebecca) finds out about this through Hicks, who is subversively working as the building’s head of security. Rebecca gets the assistance of Mimi Yutani, the granddaughter of the Company’s CEO, to smuggle them into the building just as an alien outbreak starts. I really liked the way this shaped up, although the ending and some of the action sequences need additional work.

This isn’t to say that I had given up on short stories altogether. Given some free time and access to the U of M computer lab in the early 90s, I wrote the first of what I consider my “adult” short stories (aside from a little experimental piece called “Pinnacle”), a longish horror piece called “Crucible”, which I worked and reworked so long that it’s surprising that it held together so well. After that, I wrote the first of my Dreamstories, inspired by – and trying as hard as possible to stay true to – actual dreams I’ve had. I can’t imagine how many times I’ve been in a dream, saying “This would make an *awesome* story, or even a novel!” and then wake up and find myself unable to get that feeling back, or even remember much of what happened. So when I get a dream that actually survives being dragged up from the depths into the waking world, I kind of feel the need to preserve it somehow. Up to the present, I have eight of these, and I always find them intriguing, but there’s a saying that there’s nothing as boring as someone else’s dreams, and I leave it to you to decide if that’s true.

I started a journal in 1996, one that I’ve kept up to this day. In the past 16 years, I’ve written about 400,000 words, just outlining the details of each day. I even worked backwards from the present, with the help of my wife and brother’s day planners from the high school years, old school papers, and my parent’s day calendars too. If I can pin down a date something happened, I’ll add it in, even if it’s nothing more significant than setting a record on one of my old Atari games. This endeavor is all saved in digital form, except for a four-year span between 1999 and 2003 where – for some reason – I wrote everything down longhand in blank books. That still has to be transcribed. But it’s the one project that I’m sure I’m going to continue for the rest of my life.

My next half-dozen stories dealt with some weighty issues… death and what’s beyond, if anything. The stories I wrote in the 2000’s dealt a lot with that sort of question. There’s a man who builds the perfect place for Armageddon to start (“12:00 and Holding”), a satirical – and not entirely successful -- piece about Jesus being cloned from his blood on the Shroud of Turin (“The Holy Resuscitation”), and a pioneer woman who has a run-in with a seductive dark angel, in a town perpetually shrouded by smoke from a nearby coal-mine fire (“Moloch”).

Through this time I was finishing my film projects, too, even though as time went on I became increasingly disillusioned with ever getting into the film industry. The dream of the indie film boom of the early 90s – anyone can max out their credit cards and make the next Clerks! – was fading, and the prospect of moving to Los Angeles was impossible. So I switched back to writing prose. At first I tried novelizing my original script Syzygy, but didn’t get far on it. It seems that the ideas I had for the film didn’t translate realistically into fiction. Or maybe I just didn’t find the right tone. At any rate, I abandoned it after a few chapters.

I did, however, embark on something new, a novel that resulted from my desire to write something Big & Important. The questionably-successful result, 28 IF, was the story of two exes spending a day visiting an amusement park and talking. Over the course of the day, they discuss the Big Issues, rekindle their relationship, reveal life-altering secrets, and change their worlds for better or worse, all to the soundtrack of the Beatles’ Abbey Road album. I’m quite proud of it, and I’ve informally submitted it to a publisher, although it came back with the note that there’s a lot of talking but not enough *happens* in it. That’s fair, and I always knew that even if I wrote the best novel in the world, the necessity of including all of Abbey Road’s lyrics would be a cost and a hassle no publisher would want to undertake. It’s a little short too, about half the length of your typical novel, which makes it even harder to market.

Also during this time, my cousin, who also dabbles in writing, started a round-robin story with me where we would each write a short chapter (about 500 words), then send it to the other. We ended up writing about 40 or 50 chapters, and a pattern soon emerged: my cousin would write something crazy and tangential, and I would spend my chapter finding a way to work it into the existing narrative. It eventually morphed into a story about an enchanted watch that opened an alternate dimension, and a hero who has to stop a real-life version of the Tasmanian Devil. He ends up getting caught up in a war between armies that use giant talking spiders for steeds. Yeah, it’s weird. And it might be lost to time, forever trapped in the amber of floppy disks that I may have already thrown out. Although I do remember one low-budget Christmas when I printed out the entire story for my cousin… he says he’s digging through his archives to see if he can find it.

Shortly after I finished 28 IF, I tried to keep my momentum going by starting on another novel, with the working title “Tints of Dead”. It’s based loosely on Poe’s “The Masque of the Red Death”, which I love as a bit of surreal, existential horror. In that short story, a prince shuts himself and his loyal subjects in his castle to save them from a plague that is ravaging the country. He sets everyone up in a suite of rooms, each themed with a particular color, and stages a constant masquerade party to keep everyone’s mind off the horror outside. In my story, people are invited to an exclusive nightclub, which is centered around (like Poe’s story) an imposing grandfather clock. They select animal masks, then get locked in and introduced to their host, whose motives on how and if they’ll get to go home are unclear… I got about 34,000 words into it and then ran out of steam, unsure of how to structure the back half. Actually, I had the structure thanks to Mr. Poe, but how I’m going to change it and make it work for me, I haven’t figured out.

It was during this time that I realized my personal pattern for writing stories… I seem to gravitate toward a linear, real-time story, based on another work that I admire (Abbey Road, the Poe story, etc.). It seems to be the only way I can last for anything approaching a novel’s length, like training wheels. I’ve got to have some greater framework already existing, for me to drape my own plot over it and have its contours guided. It’s part of the pattern-seeker in me… I like nothing better than when something that appears to be random comes together in a pattern.

Round about 2003 I started something that, for a while, I really thought would be the major writing project of my life…. When I was a kid, I had a collection of at least the first 30 books in the Choose Your Own Adventure Series. (Side note: for a while I actually went to the same school as the son of one of the series’ creators, R.A. Montgomery, although I never tried to get myself invited over.) I have to say that I read them a lot, and even came close to memorizing a few of them. I even remember trying to map them out, to see if there was any pattern or trick to the way the pages were laid out. By the way, there isn’t.

I always had the idea of writing a CYOA in the back of my head, although it seemed more like a kids’ thing. Then I came across a pop culture blog called Robot Skull, which I thought was awesome for the title alone, along with the fact that when you first logged into the site, your computer’s CD tray would open and you would be instructed to “Insert Quarter”. They had a neat feature on the site where the author had written the first chapter of a CYOA, and then invited people to write the next chapter to either of the choices he provided. Every new chapter would have two possible choices, and then could be added to by any other reader, ad infinitum. I have to say, I tried it once and then couldn’t stop. Before I knew it, I had filled out four branches off of one of the choices, which meant that I had written 16 mini-chapters before I even knew what was happening. At that point, I copied down what I had posted and used them to start my own CYOA. Over the next year, it actually turned into a pretty massive project. I completed the first 8 levels, following every possible choice (which means 256 chapters = 2 to the power of 8), and I followed the most promising chapters even farther than that, down to levels 11 or 12.

I had dreams of somehow parlaying this project into something that could actually net me some profit. I had visions of micro-charging readers for each time they started at the beginning, just a couple cents. Or publishing it in an actual book (remember, this is back when such a thing was actually in the realm of possibility, although I know no book company would actually undertake it now), something massive and leather-bound with multiple bookmark ribbons in the spine so you could keep track of your previous choices, which would make backtracking easier -- something I always found annoying with regular CYOA titles.

But, like so many other projects, it lost steam after a while, mostly because by definition it has no end. Like I said, my intention was always to put down the first idea that came into my head, and it turns out that the first idea isn't always the best. And each chapter, good or bad, then has to spawn a possibly infinite array of further chapters. But, I have to admit, for a while it was great fun to work on. I don't think I've ever made myself laugh so much at my own ridiculous imagination. I still go back to it from time to time -- it currently logs in at about 110,000 words, inching close to actual novel length.

I didn't really tackle any big projects again until a few years ago. While working at Borders, I realized what a dearth of paranormal romance titles there were. It seemed like they were coming out daily, a growing pile of tales about werewolves, vampires, demons, and magic-wielders set in contemporary settings. I wondered if I could do the same thing and dash off a clever little twist on a classic monster living in the modern world. Of course, the first thing a writer should be taught is not to write in order to make money, but in this case I did -- and ended up with something that will eventually, I think, turn out to be much more interesting.

I decided to make it a romance between a human and demon. I knew there were plenty of stories like this out there, but they always take place on earth. Mine takes place in Hell. I thought that would be my "in", my way to set it apart. So then I had to figure out why this human was in Hell, what he had done to get there, and how Hell itself works. You know, determining a just, fitting, and fresh method of eternal punishment for sinners isn't all that easy. I ended up with a sort of version of the Circles of Dante's Inferno, but rejiggered to use the seven deadly sins to form the hierarchy of the various levels. And for a plot, I used a standard quest device... although the goal this time is The Answer to the Eternal Question of the Meaning of Life (yes, that thing again). The hero -- if you can call him that -- thinks the whole idea of Hell is terribly unfair and pointless, and sets off to descend through the levels to confront Satan and demand some kind of explanation. That's how he comes across a female demon who seems to want the same thing.

As it stands, the couple (along with small band of travelers they’ve accumulated) have made their way into the eternal war being waged in the Circle of Wrath, and are just starting to come to terms with the fact they're falling in love. The strange thing is, the idea of constant war is one of the first I had when starting the book, and now that I've arrived, I don't quite know how to proceed. The way Hell works has been firmly established, but I'm not sure what the characters are going to learn about where they are, or how they're going to pass through it. I’ve settled on the title “Nadir”, showing my penchant for using relatively obscure words for titles, which is sure to infuriate any future publicists.

Around the time my daughter was born, I kind of stopped working on my big projects and focused on the smaller ones, mostly blog posts, little bite-size pieces that didn't take a lot of concentration to complete, as opposed to a big book that takes some time to get into every day, figuring out where all the balls you're juggling were when you left off. When there's a baby in the house, there's precious little ability to focus on something that's not right in front of you, or brainspace to process something that's entirely imaginary.

Only in the last few months have I thought of a way of maybe goosing myself into finishing at least one big project. This latest one is about a writers' workshop, a small group called the Wednesday World Forgers who meet every week to share what they're working on and trying to find ways to encourage each other. The one thing they all have in common is that they have varying degrees of writers' block, and the projects they're working on are -- you might have guessed it already -- my own unfinished works. I'm hoping that in this new story I can somehow get my own characters to solve the problems I've having with each of these projects, and maybe figure out how to complete some or all of them.

There. I think that's the bulk of it. My Complete Works. So if I were to go through and total it all up, how much would it be? Well, let me formulate a list here and then make some guesses, and we'll see what my writing life has amounted to at this point. Approximate word counts follow each:

Kid Books: 20,000
Kid Poetry: 1,000
Kid Scripts: 10,000
School Papers: 7,000
Adult Scripts: 60,000 (Syzygy, Throat Sprockets, Alien 4)
Adult Stories: 94,000 (24 short stories)
Borders.com Reviews: 5,000 (customer reviews informally written for the website I worked for)

Novels (complete and incomplete):
28 IF: 72,000
Nadir: 105,000
“Tints of Dread”: 34,000
Wednesday World Forgers: 5,000

Ongoing Projects:
Life Journal: 378,000
Ultimate CYOA: 110,000
Blog posts: 31,000

So all added up, that's somewhere in the neighborhood of 932,000 words, or the equivalent of 3,728 pages, which is about 25 novel-length books.)

Holy crap, maybe I am a writer after all.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Today, I Still Believe

Back in January 2009, on the day of President Obama’s first inauguration (even before I started this blog), I wrote the following piece, high on a specialized kind of adrenaline that only overwhelming national pride can provide. It was titled “Today, We Believe”. It went like this:

“I just couldn't let the day go by without writing down some thoughts about it... I was born less than a year before the Watergate scandal, and I think something changed about America during those days. From then until now, political cynicism and pessimism have been the norm, and the true aim of our government -- giving help, liberty, and a voice to the American people -- has been drawn off course. There have been precious few beams of light in the thirty-six years since then, and I have never lived in a world where the government wasn't something to be skeptical of, something to always be on guard about, something that had to be fought against to make things change for the better.

“But today, at least for one day, that feeling has changed.

“In the last week, I've seen more Americans excited about the direction their country is taking than I have in my entire life. I've seen patriotic songs sung without a trace of irony, and a hope on peoples’ faces that isn't already tempered by a lifetime of disappointment. Today we can sense a chance to start over, for all those hopes for our future to be rekindled anew.

“This is all because one particular man takes his seat at the head of our national table. Now that he's our President, we have another chance to make America what it always could have been. Maybe it's beyond something one man can do -- in fact, I know it is. It very well may be that so many dreams pinned to one man will prove to be a burden that no one can possibly carry. Maybe we'll all end up disappointed yet again by the ponderous weight of this thing we call our government. But in spite of all this, there's one thing that's different... as a country, we never really collectively believed that things could be any different.

“But today, we believe. And that's exactly what it takes to give it a chance at being true.”

Fast forward almost four years, to an election night that was anything but certain, when the country was still struggling to come back from the same financial crisis that Obama had inherited in his first term. With bin Laden dead and our overseas wars either ended or winding down, the economy was the issue in the front of everyone’s minds. The current administration had successfully bailed out the auto industry, salvaged the housing market, and implemented a type of national health care that included more people than ever before.

The election should have come down to one big question: Do you think that our continued recovery can be handled better? And if so, should we change tactics midstream?

However, there were portions of this country that were focusing elsewhere. Instead, they were asking questions like: Is the current President really a native-born citizen/Muslim/communist? (yes, no, and no) Has he added more to the national deficit than any other president? (no) Has this president failed to fulfill his promises of economic recovery (ignoring the fact that economy recovered *at* *all*)? And even if the answers to those questions were definitively answered, they would continue to be asked as if they hadn’t.

Because, you see, these same factions had been trying to use the state of the nation’s media to its own ends: say whatever you need to, leave it to the fact-checkers play catch-up, knowing that most people won’t hear anything beyond the initial sound bite. Move on to the next thing, never backtracking to correct or retract what you’ve said, however false it may be. Rely on the 24-hour news cycle to provide the next shiny object to distract. Never admit (even to yourself) that anything you’ve done or said was incorrect, or that you’re going to win by anything less than a landslide.

In the midst of all that, my faith has been reaffirmed. Because the majority of the American public saw through these tactics, and kept the current president in office. After all the rhetoric, false arguments, and half-truths, the majority of this nation (which, ironically, is proven more than ever to be a collection of minorities) listened to it and said, “Nah, we’re going to keep backing this guy.” The alternative was either too shady or too deluded to vote for.

And that’s what I believe now. In a way, it’s an even better victory than it was the first time. Four years ago, I believed in the power one man can wield. Today, I believe in the power that all of us, collectively, can wield.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Diary of a Mad Finger

Here’s another one of those posts about Lily. Sorry, folks, but there are just some things that I’ll want to remember years down the line. Hopefully, you’ll find this one at least a little entertaining.

Early on, Lily started playing with her fingers as puppets. I’m not sure how many kids do this, although I recall that my brother and I did use our hands as puppets for quite a while when we were kids. Anyway, she would often amuse herself at mealtimes by having her fingers walk around, have conversations with each other, and run races around and between her plates and cups. Eventually this kind of play led her to wanting my fingers to interact with hers, and a sort of cast of characters quickly became established. Let me introduce you to them:

Index: Dad Finger – while Lily’s fingers are almost always kids, my index is their dad
Middle: Mom Finger – serves the same purpose as Dad Finger, and actually the two are kind of interchangeable. Actually, f only one “parent” is present, it’s always the index
Ring: Doctor Finger – After experiencing a few trips to the hospital when she was younger (and what kid doesn’t), Lily regularly began working injuries into her play, and often dolls or other characters would fall off something and have to be taken to the hospital, where “Doctor Finger” gives them a check-up and an X-ray, then puts a bandage on them or gives them a shot and sends them on their way. This is one of my favorites… because let’s be honest, “Doctor Finger” is just fun to say.
Pinky: Baby Finger – The child of Mom and Dad Finger… only talks in baby-sounds (like “meh”, which Lily finds hilarious). The only weird part about this is that Mom and Dad Finger can’t actually touch their child… try having your index and middle fingers give your little finger a “hug”, and then let me know if you can figure out a way to do it without spraining anything.
Thumb: King Thumb – This rarely-seen character is the ultimate voice of authority, and only shows up when some sort of official declaration has to be made

So that’s how it works. Now comes the interesting part. Lily, for her part, doesn’t have a regular cast of characters for her own hand, save for one. At any moment while we’re playing, either one of her index fingers can become “Mad Finger”, a kind of mildly malevolent force that throws wrenches into the plans of her other toys. When they might be trying to build something or go somewhere, the Mad Finger might suddenly pop up and announce “The door is locked!” or “You can’t go in there!” in a deep voice… or at least, as deep as Lily can muster at four years old.

The Mad Finger also has some magical powers as well, mostly in the form of “magic glue”, which will keep a door or other opening barred even after the Mad Finger leaves. One of her most clever ideas with this happened when we were playing with her mini Lalaloopsy figurines and their little dollhouse… while one of them was using the little green-string “garden hose” to water her garden, the Mad Finger came along, took the hose, stuck the nozzle in the second-story window, then closed the shutters and fastened them with magic glue, so that the hose would flood the entire upstairs of the house. It took the rest of the Lalaloopsys a good half hour to first, evacuate all their pets up to the attic so they wouldn’t get wet, and second, figure out how to open the shutters to get the hose out. I can’t remember exactly how a solution was reached, but eventually things do work out, often with Mad Finger having a change of heart and undoing what’s been done.

Lately, Mad Finger has been working his/her/its way into our bedtime stories too. While I’m reading to her, Lily will stick her finger alongside the page, making her index finger part of the story. In these cases, Mad Finger doesn’t want to cause trouble, just to be included, so I’ll find myself adding him into the story: “I do so like green eggs and ham! Thank you, thank you, Sam-I-Am… and Mad Finger.”

I suppose on the surface, the whole concept might seem a little reminiscent of “Tony” from The Shining, with little Danny crooking his finger and growling “Danny’s not here, Mrs. Torrance.” (shudder) But this doesn’t seem to be anything like that. And I’ve formulated a theory about it…

Storytelling is about conflict. There’s always a problem that has to be overcome, some common cause for the cast of characters to work together for. And up until recently, the worlds that Lily has gravitated toward really haven’t had characters that regularly work contrary to the goals of the rest. When I look at the worlds she’s enjoyed so far, starting with Fisher-Price people, then moving on to Littlest Pet Shop, Lalaloopsies, and Strawberry Shortcake, all the characters involved have been friends. There are no “bad guys”, just friendly characters who work together. And since Lily has only just started to make characters’ feelings be the central point of the story – what can we do to make so-and-so feel better, why are those two characters not getting along – she’s needed some kind of external force to get the plot going. That’s where Mad Finger comes in.

Lately I’ve been trying to delve a little deeper into the psychology of Mad Finger… when Lily’s not particularly sleepy and I’m putting her to bed, MF will show up just to make his presence known, and maybe get me to stick around in Lily’s bedroom for a little while longer while I talk to him. Once he told m that he has a family, a mom and dad and a sister, and that they’re all “nice”. Apparently, he’s the only one in his family who’s Mad. In the past, whenever I’ve asked him what he’s mad about, he won’t have a clear answer: “I don’t know. I just am.” Lately, in discussions about his family, he’s been saying that he was “just made that way”. I suppose there’s something there to be understood about a child’s mind, and how good and bad are absolutes with no reason behind them. They’re just “that way”. It’s not until later that you understand that even people who do “bad things” think they’re the right thing to do, it’s just their perspective that is skewed.

It’s interesting how Mad Finger continues to persist, even when “bad guys” are starting to become more present in Lily’s imaginary worlds… the recent reboot of The Electric Company and even Care Bears have characters whose actions cause the conflict of the stories. I suppose eventually Mad Finger will be phased out for more malevolent characters. For now, though, I’m kind of impressed how Lily has managed to go from just playing with characters to constructing stories about them, stories that necessarily need some kind of problem introduced. I don’t think that she had any experience with these kinds of stories before she created Mad Finger… is it possible that she just somehow instinctively *knew* that such a character needed to be introduced?